SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS OF INTEGRATED CONTROL MEASURES AGAINST PARASITIC NEMATODES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOG ROSE PLANT
PDF

Keywords

dog rose; plant-parasitic nematodes; Pratylenchus; Ditylenchus; integrated management; rhizosphere; phytosanitary monitoring; biological control.

How to Cite

Turopova Muxlisa. (2026). SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS OF INTEGRATED CONTROL MEASURES AGAINST PARASITIC NEMATODES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOG ROSE PLANT. Journal of Scientific Research of Uzbek Scholars, 1(10), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23728861

Abstract

The article provides a scientific analysis of integrated management approaches to plant-parasitic nematodes associated with the roots and rhizosphere soil of dog rose (Rosa canina L.) under the conditions of Surkhandarya Region. The phytosanitary significance of nematodes belonging to the genera Pratylenchus and Ditylenchus, the limitations of diagnosing infestation, the selection of healthy seedlings, agronomic prevention, the selection of biological control agents, and the interrelationship between these measures and monitoring are examined. Based on existing faunistic records and scientific literature, a step-by-step decision-making framework is proposed. It is substantiated that the presence of an identified species does not directly prove that it has caused damage to the plant, and that the effectiveness of control measures cannot be expressed as percentages without local controlled experiments. The integrated approach prioritizes accurate diagnosis and environmentally safe prevention rather than relying exclusively on chemical agents.

PDF

References

1. Turopova M. B., Bekmurodov A. S. Surxondaryo viloyati yovvoyi dorivor o‘simliklarining nematodalari. Monografiya. 2025. 114 b. ISBN 978-9910-8497-9-4.

2. Sikora R. A., Coyne D., Hallmann J., Timper P. (eds.). Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. 3rd ed. CABI, 2018.

3. Jones J. T., Haegeman A., Danchin E. G. J., et al. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2013;14(9):946–961. doi:10.1111/mpp.12057.

4. Nicol J. M., Turner S. J., Coyne D. L., den Nijs L., Hockland S., Maafi Z. T. Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In: Jones J., Gheysen G., Fenoll C. (eds.). Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Springer, 2011. pp. 21–43.

5. Yeates G. W., Bongers T., de Goede R. G. M., Freckman D. W., Georgieva S. S. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. Journal of Nematology. 1993;25(3):315–331.

6. Ferris H., Bongers T., de Goede R. G. M. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology. 2001;18(1):13–29.

7. van den Hoogen J., Geisen S., Routh D., et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature. 2019;572:194–198. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1418-6.

8. Neher D. A. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. Journal of Nematology. 2001;33(4):161–168.