TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC PROSPECTS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
PDF

Keywords

renewable energy; hybrid power systems; resource complementarity; battery energy storage; levelized cost of electricity; capacity sizing optimization; investment risk.

How to Cite

Berdiyev Usmon, & Allanazarov Ravshan. (2026). TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC PROSPECTS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES. Kelajak Texnologiyalari Va sun’iy Intellekt, 1(4), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21537275

Abstract

Renewable energy portfolios are conventionally sized around a single dominant resource, with wind or storage added later as supplementary capacity rather than as components selected jointly against a shared resource-complementarity objective. This sequential design practice leaves substantial value on the table: solar-dominated portfolios curtail excess midday generation while remaining short of evening demand, and storage is frequently oversized for arbitrage purposes that a better-coordinated generation mix would have made unnecessary. This study proposes a Complementarity-Weighted Hybrid Dispatch (CWHD) framework, in which photovoltaic, wind, and battery-storage capacities are sized jointly according to a time-resolved complementarity index that quantifies the degree to which each resource's generation profile offsets the others' shortfalls, and dispatch is subsequently optimized against real-time price and demand signals rather than fixed priority rules. The framework was evaluated for a representative arid-region hybrid plant through comparative modeling of three configurations: a solar-only baseline, a conventional solar-wind-storage portfolio sized independently by resource, and the proposed CWHD-optimized configuration. The proposed configuration reduced curtailment from 11.3% to 3.7%, lowered the levelized cost of electricity to 34.5 USD/MWh, and increased twenty-year net present value by 73% relative to the standard portfolio, while also reducing revenue volatility, indicating that complementarity-aware sizing offers a more capital-efficient pathway to firm renewable output than sequential capacity addition.

PDF

References

[1] R. Jurasz, F. A. Canales, F. Kies, M. Guezgouz, and A. Beluco, "A Review on the Complementarity of Renewable Energy Sources: Concept, Metrics, Application and Future Research Directions," Solar Energy, vol. 195, pp. 703-724, Jan. 2020.

[2] H. Z. Al-Garni, A. Awasthi, and M. A. Ramli, "Optimal Design and Analysis of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Under Different Tracking Systems Using HOMER," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 155, pp. 42-57, Jan. 2018.

[3] M. Child, C. Kemfert, D. Bogdanov, and C. Breyer, "Flexible Electricity Generation, Grid Exchange and Storage for the Transition to a 100% Renewable Energy System in Europe," Renewable Energy, vol. 139, pp. 80-101, Aug. 2019.

[4] IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2024.

[5] B. Zakeri and S. Syri, "Electrical Energy Storage Systems: A Comparative Life Cycle Cost Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 42, pp. 569-596, Feb. 2015.