Abstract
The article proposes a methodological model of accelerated and enriched education aimed at developing the academic potential of primary school students with different initial levels of readiness. The model is not limited to pupils pre-identified as gifted; instead, it is designed for the whole class and combines common high-level learning goals with learning trajectories adapted to students’ readiness, pace and cognitive needs. The theoretical analysis supports integrating acceleration, enrichment and differentiated instruction within a single pedagogical system. For empirical verification, the study proposes a longitudinal design from Grade 2 to the end of Grade 4, including a diagnostic–adaptation–development–monitoring cycle, comparison of experimental and control classes, and multidimensional assessment of academic development. As the experiment is ongoing, no final effectiveness claims are made. The principal contribution at this stage is the methodological model, its components and a testable research hypothesis.
References
1. Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39–53. DOI: 10.1177/0016986210383155.
2. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. DOI: 10.3102/0034654316675417.
3. Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. DOI: 10.1177/0016986216630607.
4. Gül, M. D., & Ayık, Z. (2025). Impacts of enrichment programs on cognitive and affective skills of gifted students: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 20(10), e0333714. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333714.
5. Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54.
6. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students. Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
7. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
8. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ta’lim to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni, O‘RQ-637, 23.09.2020.