Abstract
This section examines the institutional model of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) as a benchmark for reforming and improving arbitral institutions in Uzbekistan. The study is grounded in comparative legal analysis, drawing on international scholarly doctrine, primary legislation, arbitral rules, and empirical data from leading institutions. The section identifies three foundational pillars of the LCIA model — legal independence, procedural flexibility, and quality of arbitral personnel — and analyses the extent to which each pillar has been incorporated into Uzbekistan's current arbitral framework. The transformation of arbitration in Uzbekistan is examined across three landmark developments: the establishment of the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC) in 2018, the adoption of the Law "On International Commercial Arbitration" in 2021, and the creation of the Tashkent International Financial Centre in 2026. The analysis demonstrates that Uzbekistan's reforms are broadly aligned with LCIA model principles, yet significant gaps remain — most notably in the areas of institutional financial independence, enforcement practice, and arbitrator pool development.
References
1. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. LRU-674 dated 16 February 2021 "On International Commercial Arbitration" // https://lex.uz/docs/-5294106
2. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4001 dated 15 November 2018 "On the Establishment of the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC) under the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Uzbekistan" // https://lex.uz/docs/4039518
3. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-48 dated 30 March 2026 "On the Establishment of the Tashkent International Financial Centre" // https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8103316
4. TIAC Arbitration Rules 2021. Article 33 (Third-Party Funding). // https://tiac.uz
5. Uzbek Arbitration Week (UzAW) 2025. // https://www.uzbekarbitrationweek.com
6. Born G.B. International Commercial Arbitration. 3rd ed. Kluwer Law International, 2021. Vol. I. P. 87.
7. Nigel Blackaby, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern, Martin Hunter. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 65.
8. Gaillard E., Savage J. (eds.) Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International, 1999. P. 1218.
9. Rustambekov I.R. International Commercial Arbitration: Textbook. Tashkent: TSUL, 2018. P. 6.
10. Rustambekov I.R., Bahramova M.B. Development of International Commercial Arbitration in Uzbekistan: Problems and Prospects // Legal Sciences Bulletin. 2020. No. 3. P. 45.
11. Bahramova M.B. Regulation and Practical Problems of Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal (Based on UNCITRAL Model Law): PhD dissertation. Tashkent, 2021. P. 89–95.
12. Uz Kursiv: Uzbekistan Positions Itself as a Rising Arbitration Hub. September 29, 2025. // https://uz.kursiv.media/en/2025-09-29/uzbekistan-positions-itself-as-a-rising-arbitration-hub/
13. Herbert Smith Freehills: An Introduction to Arbitration in Central Asia. 2024. // https://www.hsfkramer.com/insights/2024-07/an-introduction-to-arbitration-in-central-asia
14. Eldwick Law: Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan International Disputes: The Role of London-Based Arbitration in 2025. // https://eldwicklaw.com/uzbekistan-and-kazakhstan-london-based-arbitration-in-2025/
15. Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook 2024–2025 – Uzbekistan // https://www.globalarbitrationnews.com/2025/01/01/baker-mckenzie-international-arbitration-yearbook-2024-2025-uzbekistan/