STUDENT INSIGHTS INTO WEB-BASED VERSUS TRADITIONAL LEARNING
PDF

Keywords

digital technologies, web-based platforms, conventional classrooms, curriculum development, environments, evaluate, engagement, academic comprehension.

How to Cite

BERDIKULOVA MUNIRA. (2026). STUDENT INSIGHTS INTO WEB-BASED VERSUS TRADITIONAL LEARNING. Zamonaviy ta’lim Va Tilshunoslik Rivoji, 1(3), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20628837

Abstract

The widespread integration of digital technologies in higher education has established web-based platforms as permanent alternatives to conventional classrooms. As academic institutions increasingly rely on diverse delivery formats, evaluating students' experiences in these environments is essential for future curriculum development. Purpose: This study explores student insights into web-based versus traditional learning, aiming to evaluate and compare student engagement, academic comprehension, and overall educational satisfaction across both formats.

PDF

References

Arslanyilmaz, A. & Sullins, J. (2013). The extent of instructor participation in an online computer science course: How much is enough? The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(2), 63-74.

Bhagat, K. K., Wu, L. Y., & Chang, C. (2016). Development and validation of the perception of students towards online learning (POSTOL). Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 350-359. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/index.html

Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41.

Castillo, M. (2013). At issue: Online education and the new community college student. Retrieved from The Community College Enterprise, 19(2), 35-46. https://www.schoolcraft.edu/cce/community-college-enterprise

Cole, M.T., Shelley, D.J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111-131.

Coleman, S. (2009). Why do students learn online? Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/qrde-issue.html?i=p54c3c4cd77e0

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Diaz, D. P. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Retrieved from http://www.technologysource.org/article/online_drop_rates_revisited/?ut m_campaign=elearningindustry.com&utm_source=/5-ways-humanize-the- elearning-experience&utm_medium=link

Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A.N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus face-to-face introductory to sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312-331.

Drouin, M., Hile, R. E., Vartanian, L. R., Webb, J. (2013). Student preferences for online lecture formats: Does prior experience matter? The Quarterly Review of Distance from Education, 14(3), 151-162. Retrieved http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html