Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This thesis analyzes the role of model bilateral investment treaties (Model BITs) and their importance in the negotiation and adoption of bilateral treaties. The significance of model BITs in harmonizing investment policy and ensuring a stable environment for investors is illustrated by the examples of the BIT programs in Germany and the USA, countries with extensive practical experience in this area. In the conclusion, the author’s personal views are presented regarding the importance and necessity of developing a Model BIT for Uzbekistan.
References
1. Mark A. Clodfelter, The Adaptation of States to the Changing World of Investment Protection Through Model BITs, 24(1) ICSID REV.—FOR. INV.L.J. (2009).
2. Chester Brown, Introduction: The Development and Importance of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, in Model BIT Commentaries, (Chester Brown ed., 2013).
3. N. Jansen Calamita, The Making of Europe’s International Investment Policy: Uncertain First Steps, 39(3) Legal issues of economic integration (2012).
4. UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties In The Mid-1990S (1998).
5. Peter Muchlinski, Review of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaties of Norway, South Africa, and the United States, 2009-2010 Y.B. INT’L INV.LAW & POL’Y 41.
6. Tarald Laudal Berge & Oyvind Stiansen, Negotiating BITs with Models: The Power of Expertise, Pluri Courts Research Paper No. 16-13.
7. Lion Mexico Consolidated LP v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/15/2, Decision on Jurisdiction ¶ 239 (July 30, 2018).
8. Cargill, Inc. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/2, Award ¶ (Sept. 18, 2009).
9. K. Scott Gudgeon, United States Bilateral Investment Treaties: Comments on Their Origin, Purposes, and General Treatment Standards, 4 INT’L TAX &BUS.L. 105.
10. BMT Savdo va taraqqiyot konferensiyasining investitsiya siyosati bo‘yicha onlayn axborot bazasi [https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements].