Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Stylistic devices are integral to literary texts, allowing authors to convey nuanced emotions, create aesthetic appeal, and reflect cultural identity. This study examines the comparative use of stylistic devices in English and Uzbek literature, focusing on metaphor, simile, hyperbole, imagery, sound devices, irony, and humor. By analyzing selected works of William Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Abdulla Qodiriy, and Cho‘lpon, the research highlights universal and culture-specific tendencies. Findings indicate that English literature favors conciseness, abstraction, and subtle stylistic effects, while Uzbek literature emphasizes elaboration, emotional resonance, and culturally embedded symbolism. The study also addresses implications for translation, providing guidance for preserving stylistic and cultural nuances across languages.
References
1. George Lakoff, G., & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–25.
2. Zoltán Kövecses (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–78.
3. Leech, Geoffrey, & Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Pearson Education, pp. 45–90.
4. Newmark, Peter (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall, pp. 102–135.
5. William Shakespeare (1603). Hamlet. London: First Folio, pp. 15–90.
6. Jane Austen (1813). Pride and Prejudice. London: T. Egerton, pp. 10–120.
7. Abdulla Qodiriy (1930). O‘tkan Kunlar. Toshkent: Sharq, 25–112-bet.
8. Cho‘lpon (1925). Kecha va Kunduz. Toshkent: Fan, 5–60-bet.
9. D. Xudoyberganova (2021). “Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda diskurs va uning xususiyatlari.” O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti jurnali, 2-son, 54–60-bet.
10. David Crystal (2011). Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge, pp. 1–45.