Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026), Articles
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)

TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING BEYOND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Articles
Published 2026-04-30
Nafisa Alimnazarava
Student of Denau Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy
Robiya Joʻrabekova
Student of Denau Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy
Marjona O'razova
Student of Denau Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy
Asal Safarova
Student of Denau Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy
PDF

Keywords

digital learning, virtual reality, augmented reality, mobile learning, blended learning, game technologies

How to Cite

Alimnazarava , N., Joʻrabekova , R., O'razova , M., & Safarova , A. (2026). TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING BEYOND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Zamonaviy Ilmiy Yondashuvlar Va Texnologik Taraqqiyotning Ustuvor yo‘nalishlari, 1(1), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19956181
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

This article analyses the effectiveness of non‑AI digital learning tools – virtual and augmented reality, mobile learning, game technologies, learning analytics, blended learning, and social media – in educational settings. Based on systematic reviews and meta‑analyses published between 2015 and 2025. Results show that game technologies increase activity and motivation; augmented reality is suitable for novice learners, while virtual reality may impose cognitive load. Learning analytics can identify at‑risk students but remains weak in providing actionable classroom advice. Mobile learning increases flexibility, though most studies are short‑term. Blended learning produces positive outcomes in most countries. Social media can increase participation by up to 40 percent, but privacy risks remain. Conclusion: digital tools can enhance learning, but their use must align with pedagogical goals and context.

PDF

References

1. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36, 2014.

2. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112, 2020.

3. Klingenberg, S., Junker, R., & Holme, P. Virtual and augmented reality in education: a meta-analysis of cognitive load and motivation. Computers & Education, 210, 104967, 2024.

4. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. The use of mobile learning in science education: a systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 133–149, 2018.

5. Means, B., & Neisler, J. Blended learning effectiveness across countries. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 389–410, 2021.

6. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. Self-regulated learning in online environments: a meta-analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–13, 2015.

7. Greenhow, C., & Galvin, S. Social media and learning in higher education. Educational Researcher, 53(2), 89–101, 2024.

8. Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110, 2018.

9. Pellas, N., Dengel, A., & Christopoulos, A. A scoping review of immersive virtual reality in STEM education. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5431–5459, 2020.