Abstract
This article comparatively examines international management through selected corporate practices in the United States, Japan, Germany, and India. The study analyses official corporate documents and recommendations issued by international organisations. It compares management accountability, production coordination, separation of management and supervisory responsibilities, and business process assessment. An adaptation framework comprising diagnosis, selection, pilot implementation, and monitoring is proposed. The analysis suggests that the development of international management depends on aligning common corporate principles with local institutional requirements. The findings concern documented practices and do not establish the superiority of a national management model.
References
1. OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. DOI: 10.1787/81f92357-en.
2. International Labour Organization. Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. 6th ed. Geneva: ILO, 2022.https://www.ilo.org/publications/tripartite-declaration-principles-concerning-multinational-enterprises-and-3
3.Microsoft. Corporate Governance Framework. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/corporate-governance/framework (murojaat sanasi: 14.10.2026).
4.Toyota Motor Corporation. Toyota Production System. https://global.toyota/en/company/vision-and-philosophy/production-system/ (murojaat sanasi: 14.10.2026).
5.BMW Group. Leadership and Governance. https://www.bmwgroup.com/en/company/leadership-and-governance.html (murojaat sanasi: 14.10.2026).
6.Tata Business Excellence Group. Tata Business Excellence Model. https://www.tatabex.com/about-us/tata-business-excellence-model (murojaat sanasi: 14.10.2026).