Teachers’ Readiness for Artificial Intelligence in Digital Education: Evidence from TALIS 2024 and Implications for a Competence-Based Methodology
PDF

Keywords

artificial intelligence; digital education; teacher digital competence; professional learning; TALIS 2024; educational methodology; competence-based approach.

How to Cite

Gulbahor Olimova. (2026). Teachers’ Readiness for Artificial Intelligence in Digital Education: Evidence from TALIS 2024 and Implications for a Competence-Based Methodology. ILM-FAN VA INNOVATSION TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 1(10), 30-39. https://innopublication.com/index.php/jsirs/article/view/1338

Abstract

Purpose. To identify which factors most strongly limit Teachers’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital education and to derive methodological implications for teacher training. Methods. Secondary analysis of published results of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2024, which covered about 280,000 educators in 55 education systems, supplemented by descriptive statistics and rank and linear correlation analysis for ten systems (n = 10). Results. On average across OECD systems, 36% of teachers reported using AI in their work, with national values ranging from 14% (France) to 75% (Singapore). Among teachers who had not used AI, 75% cited insufficient knowledge and skills, whereas 37% cited insufficient school infrastructure. Skills for using AI were the most frequently reported area of high professional learning need (29%), while 38% of teachers had taken part in AI-related professional learning. In nine of ten analysed systems, lack of knowledge was a more frequent barrier than lack of infrastructure. The association between AI use and the knowledge barrier was negative but not statistically significant (Pearson r = −0.42, p = 0.23; Spearman ρ = −0.55, p = 0.10). Conclusions. Teachers’ competence, rather than technology access, is the primary bottleneck. A competence-based methodology of digital education is therefore proposed, built on diagnostics, pedagogy-first training, institutional enablement and ethical evaluation.

PDF

References

1. OECD. Results from TALIS 2024: The State of Teaching. TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024_90df6235-en.html

2. OECD. Results from TALIS 2024 – Country notes: Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, United States. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024-country-notes_e127f9e2-en/

3. OECD. Developing teacher expertise. In: Results from TALIS 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/10/results-from-talis-2024_28fbde1d/full-report/developing-teacher-expertise_f95ff343.html

4. Ministry of Education Singapore. Singapore teachers embrace digital technologies and benefit from strong professional development: OECD TALIS 2024 study. Press release, 7 October 2025. URL: https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20251007-singapore-teachers-embrace-digital-technologies-and-benefit-from-strong-professional-development-oecd-talis-2024-study

5. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. TALIS 2024: TALIS findings for New Zealand. Education Counts. URL: https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling2/large-scale-international-assessments/talis-2024-first-report

6. Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.

7. UNESCO. AI Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO, 2024.

8. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 2006, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054.

9. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 16, article 39.

10. Kasneci E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 2023, vol. 103, article 102274.

11. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

12. Selwyn N. Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.

13. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4996 of 17 February 2021 "On measures to create conditions for the accelerated introduction of artificial intelligence technologies".

14. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-158 of 11 September 2023 "On approval of the 'Digital Uzbekistan – 2030' strategy".