LINGUOCULTURAL REPRESENTATION OF HUMAN EMOTIONS AND INNER EXPERIENCES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK SOMATIC PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS
PDF

Keywords

somatic phraseological units, phraseology, linguocultural studies, anthropocentrism, conceptual metaphor, human emotions, inner world, cognitive linguistics, English language, Uzbek language.

How to Cite

Jumanazarov Samandar. (2026). LINGUOCULTURAL REPRESENTATION OF HUMAN EMOTIONS AND INNER EXPERIENCES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK SOMATIC PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. Journal of Technology and Innovative Research, 1(5), 60-69. https://innopublication.com/index.php/jtir/article/view/680

Abstract

The present study examines the linguocultural representation of human emotions and inner experiences through somatic phraseological units in English and Uzbek languages. Somatic phraseological units constitute a significant part of phraseological systems because they reveal the anthropocentric nature of language and demonstrate the ways in which human beings conceptualize abstract notions through bodily experience. The research focuses on phraseological expressions containing body-part components such as heart, head, eye, hand, face, and tongue, which are actively used to describe emotional, psychological, moral, and cognitive states.

The findings reveal that somatic phraseological units function as important linguistic markers of national mentality and cultural identity. Furthermore, the study contributes to comparative phraseology, cognitive linguistics, intercultural communication, and linguocultural studies by highlighting the role of bodily imagery in the formation of conceptual systems.

PDF

References

1. Amosova, N. N. (1963). Fundamentals of English Phraseology. Leningrad.

2. Brugman, C. (1988). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.

3. S.U.Jumanazarov AJ Jamol o'g'li, SU Sharipovich - International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2020 Cognitive Linguistics and Its Interpretation in Grammar

4. Cambridge University Press. (2022). Cambridge Idioms Dictionary. Cambridge.

5. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

6. Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.

7. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

8. Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

9. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10. S.U.Jumanazarov - intent research scientific journal, 2023. Features of the terminology of the english language in the field of electric power industry

11. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge University Press.

12. Kunin, A. V. (1996). Course of English Phraseology. Moscow.

13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14. Mahmudov, N. (2013). Language and Culture. Tashkent.

15. Nurmonov, A. (2010). Methodology of Linguistic Research. Tashkent.

16. Oxford University Press. (2019). Oxford Dictionary of Idioms. Oxford.

17. Qodirova, G. (2018). Linguocultural Features of Somatic Phraseological Units in Uzbek. Tashkent.

18. Rahmatullayev, Sh. (1992). Explanatory Dictionary of Uzbek Phraseology. Tashkent.

19. 11. N.N.Himmatova - Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 2023 Psychological aspects of learning a foreign language

20. Safarov, Sh. (2006). Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics. Tashkent.

21. Sayqalieva, M. (2020). Expression of Human Psychology through Somatic Phraseological Units. Language and Literature Studies, 3, 67–74.